Posts Tagged ‘cargo ferry’

Too many ships / too many routes / not enough customers?

Monday, June 28th, 2010

The Western European ferry market is having to contend with testing trading conditions at present, and there are a number of things happening that are not making it easy for ferry operators to turn a profit. From environmental compliance, the generally high cost of marine fuel and the introduction of ultra low sulphur fuel in areas such as the North Sea and Baltic Sea, these are all issues impacting on the bottom line of ferry companies over which they have very little direct control. In a weak freight transport market, ferry operators are chasing fewer customers to support their respective services which causes a “price war” on some routes where only the end user (aka the customer) benefits. With ships to fill and schedules to operate, ferry companies have little choice but to drop rates to attract new traffic and to try and keep hold of what they have already got. And so the circle of margin and profit erosion continues……

So, what can the industry do to combat these negative issues. Well, taking out some capacity would be a start, but this is easier said than done. What is stopping consolidation is not the ferry companies’ lack of money to buy their peers, but the European Commission’s competition rules. Both the MD’s of Stena Ro-ro and Norfolkline have recently claimed that these rules made it very difficult to tale over a competitor which had services on the same route. The general view from the ferry industry is that a softening of competition rules would actually help to create a more stable market through consolidation.

Take, for example, the Irish Sea market.

All the operators who have services on the Irish Sea would agree that the market has been tough now for nearly two years. However in this time, a draft of new tonnage has been introduced by companies such as Norfolkline, Seatruck and Stena Line. There has even been a new entrant to the market, Fastnet Line. Carriers such as Norfolkline and Seatruck have replaced older, smaller ships with bigger, newer vessels and Stena Line took the decision to remove their HSS high speed craft from year round use (due to fuel costs) and replace with a freight vessel offering more freight space, and more daily departures than when the HSS was operating full time.
Now, this is a market that is crying out for consolidation. There is not one company who is operating to capacity, and the major players would dearly love to be able to rationalise and consolidate. Indeed at a recent conference in Bremen, Germany the MD of Stena Ro-ro Bo Severed said “On the Irish Sea, there is intense competition, but from a competition rule point of view it is impossible to do something and we really need [consolidation], not only because we want a more stable market and more stable prices, but from an environmental point of view this is crucial. We need to look at ways soften competition rules to get this going”

Consolidation in other industries, such as air travel, is happening now as a direct impact of the global economic downturn and high fuel costs. Companies such as British Airways & Iberia, Untied Airlines & Delta have joined together in consolidating and combining their businesses to offer customers a network of services but to also benefit from “economies of scale”. There are many similarities between the aviation industry and the marine industry. The ferry industry needs “economies of scale”. I wonder how soon it will be before some of the “house hold” names of today’s ferry industry disappear through consolidation and become redundant brand names such as Sealink, Sally Lines and Ferryways?. Only time (and our leaders in Brussels) will tell!

Hazardous Goods and Ferry Travel – why all the paperwork…..

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

The carriage of hazardous goods is a necessary requirement of manufacturing industries across Europe. UK and Irish industry is reliant on ferry operators carrying these goods as part of manufacturing supply chains. Hazardous goods are usually carried as part loads or groupage, but some carriers do specialise in full load movements.

There appears to be a lack of understanding by a number of transport operators of the legal requirements for the movement of hazardous goods by sea. What makes this so frustrating is the fact that as we live on an island, so how do people expect to get here if not by sea? Eurotunnel cannot take all the various types of hazardous cargo there are, and not every operator uses this service. There are also no tunnel or road connections from the UK to Ireland.

There are different legal requirements for the transportation of hazardous goods by road to those by sea. For example, a truck operator has to run with “orange plates” – the square plates displayed at the front and rear of a vehicle, when a truck is loaded with hazardous goods and operating by road in the UK. However, when the same vehicle wants to travel on a ferry, arrangements need to be made by the ferry operator to stow the vehicle in a particular location on board the ship (depending on the nature of the hazard of the goods on board the vehicle), and dangerous goods placards (haz triangles for those of a particular age) must be affixed to the bulkhead and each side of the trailer (or lorry), the load needs to have been checked by a DGSA (Dangerous Goods Safety Advisor) of the relevant ferry company to ensure the goods can be carried (as not all dangerous goods can be carried on ferries). Oh, and when you arrive at the ferry port if the ADR (Dangerous Goods) paperwork is not correctly completed and signed then you aren’t going anywhere anyway! All of this work is undertaken to ensure that in the event of an incident, such as a fire on board ship (which is probably the most dangerous thing that can occur onboard ship, particularly if the ship is at sea), then the ships crew and emergency teams know exactly what potential hazards they have onboard.

A product that can be carried as “limited quantities” by road, and not require ADR paperwork or “orange plates”, could be classed as hazardous by sea. This is where the help of the DGSA or dispatch department of the consignor company can assist the transport operator to fully understand their legal obligations, and thus help to ensure compliance. Freightlink can also offer help and advice to customers by discussing the product types and quantities to be shipped with ferry operators to check the goods can be accepted for shipment. No operator wants to be sat on the quayside with a load that can’t be shipped and start incurring delays: if the wheels aren’t turning, the vehicle isn’t earning!

Whilst in this country we often bemoan the amount of “red tape” encompassing UK industry in support of health and safety legislation, no one wants to star in their own disaster movie! In the UK we have a government department called the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), who police and support our shipping industry and ensure compliance with maritime law. The MCA recently held a seminar in the North West of England for the shipping, transport and logistics industries to discuss, amongst other things, the issue of hazardous cargo shipments in UK territorial waters. Freightlink attended this seminar and heard from various MCA, Police and Environment Agency representatives about the damage that can be done to ships, road infrastructure and peoples lives if the carriage of hazardous goods is not undertaken correctly and goes wrong. We left the seminar with one story that will prove that if you get the carriage of dangerous goods wrong, you will need very deep pockets…….

On the 20th November 2008, at Dunkirk, Janusz Gauden, a 56 year old Polish lorry driver arrived and attempted to board a British ferry bound for Dover. He declared that he had 383Kg of dangerous goods (Methyl Methacrylate Monomer Stabilized) on his load but the ferry operator identified that the driver did not have the correct documentation and refused permission to board.

Mr. Gauden then went to Calais where he managed to board a Sea France ferry carrying 228 persons without declaring the goods. The Dunkirk ferry operator had sent an alert to Sea France to be on the look out for the driver but this information arrived after the vessel sailed with the undeclared dangerous goods on board.

The ferry operators informed the Maritime & Coastguard Agency enforcement unit who immediately alerted the Police at Dover Port. The driver was stopped and arrested as the vehicle disembarked from the ferry at Dover. He was later charged with contravening the Merchant Shipping (Dangerous Goods and Marine Pollutants) Regulations 1997 and was bailed to appear at Folkestone Magistrates Court.

On the 27th January 2009, at Folkestone Magistrates Court Janusz Gauden pleaded guilty to the above offences and was fined £2000 and order to pay £3757.98 costs.

In passing sentence the Magistrates said; “This Court takes the safety of the public very seriously. You are an experienced driver and did a deliberate act. You endangered the crew and everyone on board and the potential for disaster was driven by monetary reasons”.

I hope that none of the readers of this blog ever have a visit from the MCA or the Police to explain their companies’ actions in relation to the carriage of hazardous goods by sea.